In a word shared with staff, Zuckerberg mentions how lots of people expressed that the corporate ought to have labeled the President’s posts. According to him, Facebook didn’t take that method as a result of in line with present insurance policies, the “right mitigation is to take that content [inciting violence] down — not let people continue seeing it behind a flag.”
As per the word, Facebook will “review” three insurance policies. The insurance policies in questions are as follows:
- insurance policies permitting dialogue and threats of state use of power
- insurance policies round voter suppression
- potential choices for dealing with violating or partially-violating content material apart from the binary leave-it-up or take-it-down selections
Although Zuckerberg thinks the present insurance policies are “principled and reasonable”, it seems the corporate is open to options. As a part of these efforts, he says he has began assembly with the workforce to listen to all believable concepts.
However, he additionally factors out how revisions might enhance content material moderation within the platform. “In general, I worry that this approach has a risk of leading us to editorialize on content we don’t like even if it doesn’t violate our policies, so I think we need to proceed very carefully,” he added.
Going ahead, Facebook goals to determine a “clearer and more transparent decision-making process”. The firm may also evaluation any required structural modifications to “make sure that the precise teams and voices are on the desk.“