Jio has knowledgeable the Delhi High Court that telecom corporations can’t be held liable for “unlawful activity” occurring over calls and messages, as per the Telecom Commercial Communication Customer Preference Regulation (TCCCPR), 2018.
“Under Section 79 of the IT Act, intermediaries are exempt from liability under the Act in respect of any third-party information, data, or communication link made available or hosted by them,” refers Jio.
Jio has additionally said that even the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) is “not empowered to itself act on fraudulent/illegal exercise, nor can it impose any authorized obligation on this regard on service suppliers.”
In case you’re out of the loop, Paytm’s dad or mum firm One97 Communications moved to the Delhi High Court in opposition to Vodafone Idea, Jio, Bharti Airtel, MTNL (Mahanagar Telephone Nigam), and BSNL (Bharat Sanchar Nigam) earlier this month. The digital funds big blamed telecom operators for not taking any steps to dam spam calls and fraudsters.
In reality, One97 Communications has additionally sought Rs. 100 crores as compensation to make up for the “financial and reputational loss.” The firm had additionally referred the Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preferences Regulations (TCCCPR) 2018 in its petition.
Under the regulation, Paytm claims that telecom corporations are required to confirm alleged telemarketers earlier than granting entry to buyer information. The subsequent listening to of the case is scheduled to occur on the 24th of June.