The 15 live-action Disney remakes, ranked: Mulan to Lion King

The 15 live-action Disney remakes, ranked: Mulan to Lion King

Disney has dabbled in remaking animated classics in a live-action mildew, however after Tim Burton’s CG-filled Alice in Wonderland made a billion {dollars}, the corporate went all in on its live-action remakes.

Now, 10 years into the conversion technique, Mulan turns into the primary of those live-action remakes to bypass theaters and land directly on Disney Plus. It’s a daring transfer that would shift the trade all collectively — however is Mulan well worth the $29.99? Where does it land on our definitive rating of live-action Disney remakes?

As with any good rating, there are a couple of guidelines to go over about which motion pictures we included and which of them we didn’t. The motion pictures needed to be remakes or re-imaginings of fully-animated Disney motion pictures; Maleficent might not comply with the precise plot of Sleeping Beauty, but it surely culls from the identical supply materials. The fabulous Pete’s Dragon, however, doesn’t make the record as a result of the unique was already partially live-action. The motion pictures on the record additionally wanted to have a theatrical run — sorry, Kim Possible. Finally, we’re together with the totally animated Lion King remake as a result of it had clear live-action ambitions (and there was one non-animated shot within the film).

And now, please, be our visitor — a track that by some means seems in two motion pictures on this record — as we invite you to calm down, allow us to pull up a chair, because the Polygon employees proudly presents … our record.

[Ed. notice this publish incorporates spoilers for each Disney live-action remake and the animated motion pictures they’re primarily based on.]

Mufasa and Simba in The Lion King.

Image: Walt Disney Studios

15. The Lion King (2019)

While “live-action” doesn’t technically apply to this remake, director Jon Favreau wished immaculate CG animation to trick audiences’ brains into believing what they watched was actual. But by paving over the Pride Land with photorealistic natural world, The Lion King depends solely on nostalgia for the unique movie, staging awkward song-and-dance numbers with a brown palette and Earthly physics, and stripping the humanity out of each animal’s efficiency. The film makes all of the incorrect selections, together with the addition of 20 minutes to the run time so {that a} dung beetle can push a ball of poo throughout the African plains. In the top it’s all joyless — even for Disney fanatics. Not even Beyoncé can imbue this voice-over-heavy redux with life. —Matt Patches

Walt Disney Studios

14. Alice Through the Looking Glass (2016)

For all its issues (and it has so many), 2010’s Alice in Wonderland nonetheless had a imaginative and prescient behind it. Tim Burton’s model of Wonderland was aggressively colourful, and weird-for-the-sake-of-weird, but it surely additionally bought the good thing about being explored. The entire film was about taking us on a tour of a world and seeing every little bit of strangeness as Alice got here throughout it. In one other world it’s potential {that a} sequel, with a brand new director, may have carried out one thing comparable with another person’s imaginative and prescient driving the colours of Wonderland. But the primary one made a billion {dollars} in order that’s not the world we bought.

Alice Through the Looking Glass is weighed down by the dramatic turns of an actual plot, and the burden of attempting to 1 up a predecessor whereas bringing again every part that helped the primary film make a lot cash. As a end result, every part within the film simply looks like Tim Burton karaoke. It’s a hole imitation of the issues that resonated with a really particular viewers (our author Petrana, see beneath) six years earlier when the unique was launched. —Austen Goslin

Walt Disney Studios

13. The Jungle Book (1994)

This film doesn’t have something in frequent with the 1967 animated traditional aside from names. The animals don’t speak, as a result of nearly all of them are performed by actual animals, nor do they romp by way of the jungle and lift a small human boy — once more actual animals — however hey, the child’s identify remains to be Mowgli. This Jungle Book is extra of an action-adventure-romance about colonialism. After stumbling its means by way of nearly the precise plot of Tarzan, this Jungle Book ends in a third-act set-piece straight out of Temple of Doom. There’s a hidden historic temple filled with treasure, with booby traps, a vault that fills with sand (that buries a personality alive), and the largest snake you’ve ever seen — which winds up consuming the villain in a scene far too horrific for this film’s PG score.

If this model of The Jungle Book had been a colonialist drama about an Indian boy falling in love with a British woman who learns to respect the sanctity of nature, or an Indiana Jones knock-off with some spectacular animal appearing it will have been thrilling. Instead, it falls proper between the 2 and by no means manages to make both plot attention-grabbing. —AG

Walt Disney Studios

12. 102 Dalmatians (2000)

102 Dalmatians has the identical downside many sequels with good antagonists do: it fell in love with its villain. It’s straightforward to see why. Glen Close is fabulous as Cruella de Vil and appears to be having the time of her life. She’s a high-fashion sophisticate with a maniacal love of fur coats and a puppy-murdering plan to make the right one. Her identify is principally Cruel and Evil, her license plate reads Devil at a look, and Close is aware of that this villain by no means must be any subtler than that.

But Cruella works within the authentic as a result of the film isn’t actually about her. She exhibits up at any time when the film wants a comic book raise, or a scary second, but it surely’s nonetheless in regards to the heroic canines. The sequel isn’t. There are nonetheless canines, however the film cares extra about Cruella. Even when she’s briefly cured of her love of fur — sure by Dr. Pavlov, the names aren’t refined right here — it’s laborious to not do not forget that her authentic, and future, plan is to homicide 100 canines to make a coat. She’s the villain for a motive, and this film simply offers us an excessive amount of Cruella face-time for her to be enjoyable anymore. What’s that? Disney’s making a Cruella prequel … oh good. —AG

Belle (Emma Watson) and her father (Kevin Kline) in Beauty and the Beast.

Photo: Walt Disney Studios

11. Beauty and the Beast (2017)

The one factor that basically struck me in regards to the live-action Beauty and the Beast was that, as a substitute of ending on a shot of both of its two leads and even the Beast’s citadel, it ended on a shot of the now-human former harpsichord, performed by Stanley Tucci, grinning by way of a mouthful of false enamel after having misplaced all of his actual ones whereas in harpsichord kind. It’s a picture charged with macabre power, after which segues immediately right into a credit sequence that feels extra like an in memoriam reel than the rest.

It’s most likely probably the most attention-grabbing factor in regards to the movie, moreover Luke Evans’ terrific flip as Gaston. Emma Watson and Dan Stevens get misplaced in a CGI soup that solely muddies what’s occurring on display moderately than enhancing or clarifying it. “Be Our Guest” turns into the ultimate combat in a superhero film moderately than a colourful culinary bonanza, and the brand new songs are, sadly, drags. —Karen Han

Maleficent (Jolie) looks fondly at Aurora (Elle Fanning).

Walt Disney Studios

10. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (2019)

The live-action Sleeping Beauty riff Maleficent didn’t beg for a comply with up, and but we bought one! And it may very well be quite a bit worse than it’s. Angelina Jolie and Michelle Pfeiffer save the film with completely stellar performances, although it’s nonetheless laborious to purchase that Pfeiffer’s Queen Ingrith needs to kill all fairies as a result of she … is allergic to flowers? Thinks her brother died? We’re nonetheless not clear about that. When the film focuses on Maleficent’s conflict with the royal household, it guidelines. The awkward meet-the-parents dinner is humorous and deliciously tense, as Jolie’s quips slice by way of the air with as a lot sharpness as her cheekbones. But once we draw back from the household drama to overarching mythology that nobody actually wanted, to fantasy battle that was seemingly resolved within the first film, it drags. — Petrana Radulovic

Mulan stands among a group of soldiers in the Mulan remake

Photo: Jasin Boland/Walt Disney Pictures

9. Mulan

The irritating factor in regards to the Mulan remake is that the entire threads of a very good film are there — an opportunity for a extra correct retelling of the legend, tightly-choreographed combat sequences, some fairly beautiful cinematography — however the remaining product is woven collectively clumsily. How a lot the filmmakers wish to depend on the 1998 animated movie finally looks like indecision; there are not any songs on this model, however a number of the lyrics are nonetheless clunkily spoken out loud and really feel like “haha, see what we did there?” moments. The emotional beats that labored with the unique, like Mulan’s resolution to run away and be a part of the military, really feel rushed. So why embrace them in any respect when there are such a lot of extra plot factors? In the top, whereas there are some issues that work in regards to the new model (I’m right here for the Shang substitute character Chen Honghui and the gorgeous dope combat sequences throughout the metropolis partitions), all collectively it simply makes me wish to rewatch the unique — a standard facet impact of most of those stay motion diversifications. — PR

Walt Disney Studios

8. Alice in Wonderland (2010)

Let me say that my reward for Alice in Wonderland carried all of it the best way to this abnormally excessive place. What can I say? Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland is a film for a 14-year-old Hot Topic-wearing ladies who listened to pop punk bands and reblogged edgy Disney edits on Tumblr. And when Alice in Wonderland got here out, I used to be that 14 year-old woman. There are definitely unhealthy issues you possibly can say about Alice in Wonderland: the garish manufacturing design and overblown CGI, for one, to not point out the unlucky implications that Alice might need a big function within the Chinese opium wars on the finish of the film. But it wholeheartedly indulges in its teenage woman fantasies — Alice wears a bunch of lovely clothes, but in addition will get some cool armor! She has a magical sword! She rides an enormous snow leopard creature! She’s the savior of the realm! She’s simply COOL! — giving it a heat place in my coronary heart, haters be damned. —PR

Mowgli with Baloo

Walt Disney Studios

7. The Jungle Book (2017)

Jon Favreau’s remake of Disney’s 1967 animated movie was simply ok to warrant The Lion King. The human aspect goes a great distance: As Mowgli, newcomer Neel Sethi nails the instincts of a boy raised by wolves, the comfort of floating round by way of life with an enormous bear, the fear of Shere Khan’s confrontation, and the existential dizziness of realizing you don’t belong within the jungle. Favreau enhances the efficiency by turning Jungle Book into an action-adventure film — just a few pictures nod on to the unique movie. But like Lion King, the preliminary rush of seeing the Baloo and Bagheera realized with photoreal animation subsides, and the spectacle sans the music aspect leaves one thing to be desired. It’s nice! —MP

aladdin remake will smith’s blue genie

Photo: Walt Disney Studios

6. Aladdin (2019)

For all of the hoopla and uproar about blue Will Smith, the Aladdin remake is deeply nice. The blockbuster’s worst crime is the uninspired choreography — as a substitute of racing by way of Agrabah after stealing a loaf of bread, as an example, Aladdin casually meanders by way of the streets with out a lot alarm. New characters and plotlines hold the movie recent sufficient to be participating; it’s not only a dusty rehash of the unique, however brings one thing to the story that feels extra justifiable than a number of the different remakes. Princess Jasmine, as a substitute of getting some random pastime tacked on as a result of “feminism,” finds her personal company by the top of the film. It takes a bit for Will Smith and Mena Massoud to seek out their chemistry, which shines the most effective when its not attempting to copy the unique and as a substitute will get to be its personal dynamic. Overall, probably the most glowing factor to say about this one is that it may have been an entire lot worse. —PR

Christopher Robin. (Ewan McGregor) with his long time friend Winnie the Pooh in Disney’s live-action adventure CHRISTOPHER ROBIN.

Laurie Sparham/Walt Disney Pictures

5. Christopher Robin (2018)

Movies that function adults getting again in contact with their inside little one often solely cope with absolutes. This sometimes entails forsaking a soul-sucking day job as a way to pursue a extra fulfilling and artistic line of labor, or to focus totally on household. Christopher Robin is the uncommon movie to understand that compromise is important in actual life, and manages to tug it off with out being an entire downer.

That mentioned, Christopher Robin will most likely make you cry. It’s a surprisingly considerate meditation on rising up, faintly equating abandoning your childhood mates to committing murder and making it clear that stability is important in relation to being comfortable when you’ve grown up. The movie is made much more potent by the best way Pooh and firm have been rendered within the trend of the unique illustrations moderately than their extra readily recognizable present-day counterparts, making them look by some means extra plaintive and melancholy. As for the movie’s human contingent, Ewan McGregor stars because the grown-up Christopher Robin, reckoning along with his departure from the Hundred Acre Wood in addition to attempting to be a very good husband, father, and worker. —KH

Dumbo (2019) - Dumbo performing in the circus

Walt Disney Studios

4. Dumbo (2019)

Most of Tim Burton’s latest work doesn’t encourage a lot confidence (sorry, Petrana), however in opposition to all odds, his Dumbo soars. In half, it’s as a result of he’s used his ticket into the Mouse House to make a movie in regards to the vagaries of company greed and the way it throttles artwork in a thinly veiled reference to the Disney-Fox merger. The story of just a little elephant who learns to fly takes on grander proportions as Burton builds a human forged round him, bringing his former Batman Returns stars Michael Keaton and Danny DeVito again to play a rich impresario and the small-time ringmaster who falls beneath his spell as Dumbo turns into more and more well-known.

Blessedly, the little elephant in Tim Burton’s Dumbo isn’t photorealistic. Or, a minimum of, although his pores and skin could also be leathery and his tiny physique might carry the entire heft of an actual elephant’s, his eyes nonetheless stay cartoonishly giant and glossy, capable of convey the entire feelings he can’t by way of speech. At occasions, he seems to be unusual, however so it goes with all of Burton’s work. The key right here is that he’s not making an attempt a complete retread of what got here earlier than, and that he’s touring into extra private (and therefore extra affecting) territory. —KH


Walt Disney Studios

3. Maleficent (2014)

For Johnny Depp or Will Smith, starring in a Disney live-action remake was a solution to siphon the magic of a mega model. For Angelina Jolie, it’s the opposite means round. Disney’s re-imagining of the Sleeping Beauty story invests within the hearth and glow of the A-lister, who instructions the display as she flutters round a fantasy world with a pair of darkish fairy wings. Elle Fanning, one other main expertise of her technology, costars, and enlivens what may have been one other murky march throughout CG backdrops (grrrr, these Alice motion pictures — sorry, Petrana!) right into a story of female revenge. Yes, our antihero nonetheless turns right into a dragon, checking the field of the unique movie’s large spectacle, however the film pops when it’s Jolie on display, chewing up surroundings. —MP

Walt Disney Studios

2. 101 Dalmatians (1996)

One of the issues of Disney’s live-action remakes is that the villains not often stack as much as the animated originals. The renaissance villains are large, foolish, theatrical, filled with ridiculous melodrama, and nonetheless terrifying to younger minds. Their pitched-up personalities had been good for that eras lovely animation, however the evil alchemy that made these characters work is one thing that’s eluded most of Disney’s live-action remakes during the last a number of years. These new villains don’t have any of the attraction, charisma, or enjoyable of their extra dastardly animated counterparts. The solely actual exception to that got here in 1996 when Disney forged Glen Close as Cruella de Vil.

101 Dalmatians is definitely the story of heroic canines and their defeat of the evil would-be pet assassin, but it surely’s Close’s efficiency as Cruella that basically makes the film. Cruella is the one live-action villain, up to now, to affix the pantheon of Disney’s nice evil characters and similar to the renaissance motion pictures these villains come from, Cruella’s good — and by no means over-used — presence helps elevate this a minimum of close to a few of Disney’s classics. — AG

Cinderella at the ball

Walt Disney Studios

1. Cinderella (2015)

The animated Cinderella is timeless and delightful, however the story itself is straightforward. Perhaps extra so than the opposite motion pictures on this record, the Cinderella fairy story has had dozens upon dozens of diversifications and the simplicity of its story signifies that reimaginings are welcome. The 2015 Cinderella offers depth to the Disney story; our heroine was at all times kind-hearted and resilient, however this model offers her extra backstory and character, together with a reference to the prince that goes past their fateful assembly on the ball.

The forged shines: Lily James is so effortlessly Cinderella; Richard Madden brings attraction to the generic prince; Cate Blanchett is a formidable and nearly sympathetic stepmother; and Helena Bonham Carter the right quirky fairy godmother. The costumes are beautiful: Cinderella’s ball robe seems to be like a watercolor portray; Prince Kit’s spring inexperienced embroidered driving jacket slays; Lady Tremaine’s nearly anachronistic every day put on suspends the film in a nebulous level of fantasy time. Above all, although, is the message of “Have courage and be kind,” a delicate reminder that seamlessly matches into the fairytale and sticks with you afterwards. —PR

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.